by Murray Steele » Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:32 am
I would agree with Paddington here. Cretainly it is true that to write a symphony at the age of young Glazunov (I read somewhere that the audience were surprised to see a mere boy when he received their applause) is quite something, but it is a different matter when one considers their merit. None of the Mendelssohn String Symphonies come anywhere near the later symphonies for full orchestra in value: they are tuneful and well-structured, but are really no more than imitations of current works of other composers. The same applies to Mozart (whether helped by his father or not in his early works).
The question of how many of these child prodigies go on to mature into 'good' composers is another issue. Saint Saens produced two or three works of real quality (2nd Piano Concerto for instance) but the rest is very run-of-the-mill. Glazunov is an even more striking case: I've heard his eight symphonies several times, but cannot recall any of their themes (I suggest this is an important measure of a really great composer, the ability to write memorable, and not just 'pleasant', music).