by Beagle » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:45 am
Dear Beeb forum,
Forgive my ill-tempered debut, but I have been moved to communicate by what strikes my mind as an absurdity, or rather a pair of paradoxa implicit in The Vote, i.e. this on-line button-clicking. I confess that, yes I did participate, but I did so with increasing misgivings. I have not felt so conflicted since the last election.
Paradox number one:
As a person with far too much money and time, i.e. an audiophile, who has purchased and listened intently to approximately seventy new discs in 2009, I cannot regard the roster of eighteen discs here as a meaningful representation of the thousands of discs issued last year. Even in the rarified realm of SACD, approximately two new discs a day appear. However golden the ears and infallible the papacy might be, eighteen is a mathematically insignificant number here.
Paradox number two:
I am not one to dwell upon kiloHertz and sampling rates; I will merely state the obvious: On-line sound is laughably inadequate for the task to which it has been recruited here. I ask rhetorically, would one compare the merits of Fragonard to Manet on the basis of a black and white half-tone photograph in a newspaper? The addition of video images is mere distraction, since sound is invisible.
Were I the editor of this publication, I would poll the internet public throughout the year regarding every disc (inviting submission of any disc publication not already noted), and publish the results at year's end. --With the stipulation that the voter had audited his selections at leisure under optimal conditions.
Beagle of Westcock